Apache Cassandra NoSQL Performance Benchmarks
Apache Cassandra is one of the leading NoSQL platforms for business applications today. By offering benefits such as continuous availability, high scalability and performance, strong security, and operational simplicity – all while lowering overall cost of ownership - Cassandra has become a proven, solid choice for both technical and business stakeholders to adopt. When compared to other platforms such as HBase, MongoDB as well as Redis and MySQL among others, Cassandra is able to deliver high performance under heavy workloads.
The following benchmark tests provide a graphical, ‘at a glance’ view of how these platforms compare under different scenarios.
End Point, a database and open source consulting company, benchmarked the top NoSQL databases – Apache Cassandra, Apache HBase, and MongoDB – using a variety of different workloads on Amazon Web Services EC2 instances. This is an industry-standard platform for hosting horizontally scalable services such as the three NoSQL databases that were tested. In order to minimize the effect of AWS CPU and I/O variability, End Point performed each test 3 times on 3 different days. New EC2 instances were used for each test run to further reduce the impact of any “lame instance” or “noisy neighbor” effect on any one test.
A summary of the workload analysis is available below. For a review of the entire testing process with testing environment configuration details, the benchmarking NoSQL databases white paper by End Point is available.
The following workloads were included in the benchmark:
- Read-mostly workload, based on YCSB’s provided workload B: 95% read to 5% update ratio
- Read/write combination, based on YCSB’s workload A: 50% read to 50% update ratio
- Write-mostly workload: 99% update to 1% read
- Read/scan combination: 47% read, 47% scan, 6% update
- Read/write combination with scans: 25% read, 25% scan, 25% update, 25% insert
- Read latest workload, based on YCSB workload D: 95% read to 5% insert
- Read-modify-write, based on YCSB workload F: 50% read to 50% read-modify-write
|For the load process, MongoDB was not able to scale effectively to 32 nodes and produced errors until the thread count was reduced to 20.|
Engineers at the University of Toronto, in 2012, conducted a thorough benchmarking analysis of various NoSQL platforms including: Apache Cassandra, HBase, MySQL, Redis and Voldemort. The testing was extremely thorough and included a view into performance under varying workloads.
For a look at the details behind this analysis as well as a complete write up of the benchmark configurations used, the white paper Solving Big Data Challenges for Enterprise Application Performance Management provides all of the insight from this test. Overall their results identified Apache Cassandra the “clear winner throughout our experiments”.
A summary of throughput and latency results are available here.
Throughput for workload Read/Write
Throughput for workload Read/Scan/Write
Read latency for workload Read/Write
Write latency for workload Read/Write
Netflix decided to run a test designed to validate their tooling and automation scalability as well as the performance characteristics of Cassandra. The results of their testing are provided below. For a more thorough write up of the Netflix testing process including configuration settings and commentary, visit their tech blog post titled Benchmarking Cassandra Scalability on AWS – Over a million writes per second.